<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sixth Circuit Court Rules That Obesity Is Not Covered Under ADA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://creativedestruction.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/sixth-circuit-court-rules-that-obesity-is-not-covered-under-ada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://creativedestruction.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/sixth-circuit-court-rules-that-obesity-is-not-covered-under-ada/</link>
	<description>No Assumption is Sacred</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 00:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brutus</title>
		<link>http://creativedestruction.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/sixth-circuit-court-rules-that-obesity-is-not-covered-under-ada/#comment-7055</link>
		<dc:creator>Brutus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://creativedestruction.wordpress.com/2006/09/12/sixth-circuit-court-rules-that-obesity-is-not-covered-under-ada/#comment-7055</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Judge Gibbons, in her concurrence, concedes that a “literal” reading does not support the Court’s position, but argues that a missing comma which existed in an earlier piece of legislation the ADA took its language from should be the controlling authority.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So the decision hung on the placement of a comma? I keep telling my students they should care about punctuation, but do they listen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Judge Gibbons, in her concurrence, concedes that a “literal” reading does not support the Court’s position, but argues that a missing comma which existed in an earlier piece of legislation the ADA took its language from should be the controlling authority.</p></blockquote>
<p>So the decision hung on the placement of a comma? I keep telling my students they should care about punctuation, but do they listen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
